U.S. Representative
Tracey Mann
Kansas District 1
RepublicanVery Conservative
Contact
Voting Profile
Legislative Record
Most Active Policy Areas
#1 healthcare#2 budget
40
Votes Analyzed
Data sources: voteview, congress.gov
Political Position
Ideology Spectrum
0.61Very Conservative
Representative Tracey Mann positions himself on the more conservative end of the Republican spectrum, with a NOMINATE score of 0.606 that places him to the right of the average House Republican. His voting pattern reflects traditional conservative priorities, particularly strong support for defense measures and skepticism toward majority-party procedural motions.
LiberalModerateConservative
Republican avg
Near the average for Republicans (0.52)
Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)
Policy Positions
Category Breakdown
40
total votes analyzed
Overview
Tracey Mann represents Kansas's 1st Congressional District, a largely rural district covering western and central Kansas. His voting record reflects priorities consistent with representing an agricultural region while maintaining a firmly conservative approach to federal policy. In healthcare votes, Mann has shown a mixed pattern with 48% yea votes, suggesting he evaluates healthcare legislation on a case-by-case basis rather than following a strictly uniform approach. His defense-related votes show unanimous support (100% yea), indicating strong backing for military and national security measures. Notably, Mann voted against all three agriculture-related bills in the recorded sample, which may reflect specific policy disagreements with the content of those particular pieces of legislation rather than opposition to agricultural interests, given the importance of farming to his district. His budget votes lean toward opposition (43% yea), consistent with fiscal conservative principles.
Key Positions
- •Strong supporter of defense and military-related legislation
- •Consistently opposes Democratic procedural motions and rules resolutions
- •Takes a selective approach to healthcare legislation
- •Demonstrates fiscal conservative tendencies on budget matters
- •Opposes certain agricultural bills despite representing a farm-heavy district
By Policy Area
Healthcare25
48% yea52% nay
Budget & Spending7
43% yea57% nay
Analysis updated: January 9, 2026
Campaign Finance
Follow the Money
Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below. Verify on FEC.gov →
Career: $6.6M
Fundraising Over Time
Raised per election cycleSpent
Contribution Sources
Individual$345K
37%
PAC / Committees$598K
63%
Individual Breakdown
Itemized (>$200)
$335K
Small Dollar (<$200)
$10K
Donation Sizes
Under $200
$13K · 1%
$200 – 499
$101K · 12%
$500 – 999
$38K · 4%
$1,000 – 1,999
$134K · 16%
$2,000+
$570K · 67%
Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.
Where the Money Comes From
In-state (KS)$649K · 77%
Out-of-state$196K · 23%
Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.
KS
$649K
FL
$31K
VA
$27K
CO
$13K
TX
$13K
DC
$12K
MO
$10K
AZ
$9K
Top Contributors
Top Contributing Industries
Top Donor Employers
SELF-EMPLOYED$94K
HOMEMAKER$87K
RETIRED$49K
SELF$22K
WINTER LIVESTOCK$14K
VENTURE CORPORATION$14K
AMERICAN WARRIOR$11K
SILVER COMPANIES$8K
NULL$8K
BLUE BEACON INTERNATIONAL, INC$7K
VALLEY FEEDS MILL$7K
MARCH OIL CO.$7K
Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.
Where the Money Goes
Spending by Purpose
Other / Uncategorized
$340K
Administrative
$131K
Transfers
$15K
Refunds
$5K
Advertising
$3K
Fundraising
$2K
Contributions
$2K
Materials
$150
Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.
Top Payees
1.$126K
THE STANTON GROUP, LLC
2.$72K
THE KLH GROUP LLC
3.$52K
FOR THE CAUSE
4.$48K
HARDER, BRANDON
5.$46K
LES WILLIAMSON LLC
6.$40K
BARCLAYS
7.$26K
SINGULARIS GROUP
8.$18K
UNITED STATES TREASURY
Detailed Breakdown
Expenditures
Operating Costs
$504K
Net Operating
$504K
Transfers
Transfers Out
$2K
Refunds
Individual Refunds
$5K
Outside Spending (Super PACs)
Supporting
$497K
Opposing
$211K
Total Outside Spending
$708K
Top Outside Spenders
01
$400KAMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ACTION, INC.(AFP ACTION)
+$400K
02
$211KCONSERVATIVE OUTSIDER PAC
-$211K
03
$67KAMERICAN VALUES FIRST
+$67K
04
$25KKANSANS FOR LIFE FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
+$25K
05
$4KNATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE VICTORY FUND
+$4K
06
$429.34KANSAS FARM BUREAU VOTERS ORG/ELECT FARM BUREAU FRIENDS FUND (KS FARM BUR VOTE FBF FUND)
+$429.34
07
$283.32COMMON SENSE ISSUES INC
-$283.32
Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.
Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 7/15/2026FEC: H0KS01123Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Voting Record
Congressional Votes
35 votes across 6 categories