Voting Profile

Legislative Record

377 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 healthcare#2 budget#3 agriculture#4 other#5 defense

377

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.49Progressive

Senator Tammy Baldwin is a progressive Democrat whose voting record places her to the left of her party's average. Her NOMINATE score of -0.487 indicates she consistently supports liberal policy positions, making her one of the more progressive voices in the Democratic caucus.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

More liberal than the average Democrat (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

377

total votes analyzed

Overview

Tammy Baldwin has served Wisconsin in Congress since 1999, first in the House of Representatives before being elected to the Senate in 2012. She made history as the first openly LGBTQ+ person elected to the U.S. Senate and the first woman elected to represent Wisconsin in that chamber. Her legislative record shows strong engagement across multiple policy areas, with particularly active involvement in healthcare issues, where she has cast nearly 200 recorded votes. Her voting patterns suggest consistent support for expanded healthcare access, environmental protections, and financial sector oversight. Baldwin's defense voting record is notably high at 89% in favor, suggesting she has supported major defense authorization and appropriations measures despite her progressive positioning on other issues. This indicates a willingness to engage pragmatically on national security matters while maintaining liberal stances elsewhere.

Key Positions

  • Strong advocate for healthcare access and affordability
  • Supports environmental and clean energy initiatives
  • Backs financial industry oversight and consumer protections
  • Generally supportive of defense spending measures
  • Advocates for agricultural policies relevant to Wisconsin constituents
  • Progressive stance on social policy issues

By Policy Area

Healthcare194
55% yea45% nay
Budget & Spending40
55% yea45% nay
Agriculture37
54% yea46% nay
Other28
46% yea54% nay
Defense27
89% yea11% nay
Environment & Energy24
67% yea33% nay
Banking & Finance11
91% yea9% nay
Social Security7
43% yea57% nay

Analysis updated: January 9, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below. Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $109.0M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$13.5M

93%

PAC / Committees$1.1M

7%

Party Committee$5K

0%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$7.2M

Small Dollar (<$200)

$6.2M

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$1.8M · 72%
$200 – 499
$172K · 7%
$500 – 999
$169K · 7%
$1,000 – 1,999
$195K · 8%
$2,000+
$164K · 6%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (WI)$735K · 61%
Out-of-state$479K · 39%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

WI
$735K
CA
$91K
NY
$52K
IL
$44K
DC
$39K
FL
$21K
TX
$20K
VA
$18K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

N/A$590K
NOT EMPLOYED$146K
NULL$83K
SELF-EMPLOYED$42K
MARQUIS MANAGEMENT INC$17K
NONE$15K
SELF$14K
EPIC$9K
RETIRED$8K
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN$7K
OSHKOSH CORPORATION$7K
ULTRATEC INC$6K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$1.4M
Fundraising
$401K
Administrative
$171K
Advertising
$34K
Travel
$19K
Contributions
$5K
Materials
$258.48

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

RWT PRODUCTION LLC

$339K
2.

QTI HUMAN RESOURCES - TANDEM

$268K
3.

AUTHENTIC CAMPAIGNS

$212K
4.

SPECTOR ROH STRATEGIES LLC

$208K
5.

NGP VAN, INC.

$187K
6.

THE KAUFFMAN GROUP

$96K
7.

QTI HUMAN RESOURCES

$85K
8.

BF DIRECT LLC

$82K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$15.1M

Operating Offsets

$29K

Net Operating

$15.1M

Transfers

Transfers Out

$446K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$73K

Committee Refunds

$2K

Coverage: 1/1/2011 12/31/2012FEC: S2WI00219Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)