Official portrait of Scott H. Peters, U.S. Representative for California

U.S. Representative

Scott H. Peters

California District 50

DemocratModerate Liberal

Votes on Record

95

across 10 categories

102 analyzed in depth

Contact

202-225-0508Official Website2369 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0550

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

102 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 healthcare#2 budget#3 other#4 defense

102

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.19Moderate Liberal

Representative Scott Peters positions himself as a moderate liberal within the Democratic Party, with a voting record that places him notably more conservative than the average House Democrat. His NOMINATE score of -0.193 suggests he occupies the centrist wing of his party, potentially making him more amenable to bipartisan positions on certain issues.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

More conservative than the average Democrat (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

102

total votes analyzed

Overview

Scott Peters represents California in the U.S. House as a Democrat who tends toward the moderate end of his party's spectrum. His voting patterns show a willingness to break from strict party-line positions, as evidenced by his placement significantly to the right of the average House Democrat. His legislative focus appears concentrated on healthcare issues, where he has cast the majority of his recorded votes. His 46% 'yea' rate on healthcare votes suggests a selective approach, supporting some healthcare measures while opposing others. On budget matters, he has shown a slightly higher tendency to vote in favor (56%), indicating pragmatic engagement with fiscal legislation. Peters has shown strong support for taxation and housing measures based on his limited recorded votes in these categories, while demonstrating more skepticism toward banking and finance legislation, where he voted 'nay' on all three recorded votes. His procedural voting pattern shows consistent opposition to Republican-led 'previous question' motions while supporting Democratic recommit motions, reflecting standard minority party tactics during his early tenure.

Key Positions

  • Moderate approach to healthcare legislation with selective support
  • Generally supportive stance on budget-related measures
  • Opposition to banking and finance legislation in recorded votes
  • Support for taxation and housing initiatives
  • Consistent procedural opposition to majority party control of floor debate

By Policy Area

Healthcare67
46% yea54% nay
Budget & Spending9
56% yea44% nay
Other7
57% yea43% nay
Defense6
50% yea50% nay

Analysis updated: January 9, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below. Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $23.8M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$336K

24%

PAC / Committees$1.1M

76%

Self-Funded$2K

0%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$320K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$16K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$26K · 4%
$200 – 499
$10K · 2%
$500 – 999
$62K · 9%
$1,000 – 1,999
$129K · 19%
$2,000+
$445K · 66%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$437K · 67%
Out-of-state$219K · 33%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA
$437K
DC
$40K
MA
$38K
VA
$34K
NY
$21K
TX
$19K
CO
$12K
CT
$11K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

N/A$244K
SELF-EMPLOYED$27K
RA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP$18K
ARNOLD VENTURES$14K
NULL$14K
GENERAL ATOMICS$14K
ROBBINS GELLER$8K
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP$8K
ENDEAVOR BIOMEDICINES$8K
SEAN N PARKER FOUNDATION$7K
KLEINER PERKINS$7K
INVESTMENT ASSOCIATE$7K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$705K
Contributions
$366K
Materials
$128K
Administrative
$110K
Transfers
$35K
Fundraising
$12K
Refunds
$3K
Advertising
$1K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

DCCC

$278K
2.

MOLLY ALLEN ASSOCIATES LLC

$193K
3.

SAN DIEGO COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY

$121K
4.

CAPITAL STRATEGIES

$97K
5.

GUSTO

$67K
6.

TRUONG, JASMINE

$67K
7.

BLUE WAVE POLITICAL PARTNERS

$62K
8.

ALG POLLING, INC. DBA IMPACT RESEARCH INC.

$48K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$894K

Operating Offsets

$10K

Net Operating

$884K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$4K

Committee Refunds

$1K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$720K

Opposing

$13.1M

Total Outside Spending

$13.9M

Top Outside Spenders

01

NRCC

-$9.5M
$9.5M
02

AMERICANS FOR TAX REFORM

-$2.8M
$2.8M
03

CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND

-$513K
$513K
04

AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION PAC

+$250K
$250K
05

JOBS OPPORTUNITY AND FREEDOM POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE - JOFPAC

-$199K
$199K
06

VETERANS AID PAC INC

+$150K
$150K
07

PROGRESSIVE KICK INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURES

-$110K
$110K
08

CENTER FORWARD COMMITTEE

+$101K
$101K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 6/30/2026FEC: H2CA52089Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Scott H. Peters — U.S. Representative for California 50: Voting Record & Donors | PowerVote