Official portrait of Janice D. Schakowsky, U.S. Representative for Illinois

U.S. Representative

Janice D. Schakowsky

Illinois District 9

DemocratVery Progressive

Votes on Record

270

across 12 categories

Contact

202-225-2111Official Website2408 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-1309

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

270 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 healthcare#2 budget#3 agriculture#4 defense#5 other

270

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.60Very Progressive

Representative Schakowsky positions herself on the progressive end of the Democratic Party, with a NOMINATE score of -0.602 that places her notably to the left of her party's average. Her voting record reflects consistent support for liberal policy positions across most major legislative areas.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

More liberal than the average Democrat (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

270

total votes analyzed

Overview

Janice D. Schakowsky has served in the U.S. House representing Illinois as a Democrat, establishing herself as one of the more progressive voices in the House Democratic caucus. Her voting record demonstrates strong engagement with healthcare policy, where she has cast the largest share of her recorded votes, though she has opposed healthcare-related measures about 53% of the time, suggesting opposition to bills that may not align with her preferred policy approaches. On budget and agricultural matters, Representative Schakowsky has shown majority support, voting in favor of legislation approximately 59% of the time in both categories. Her defense-related voting shows the highest rate of support at 73%, indicating willingness to back certain military and national security measures despite her progressive positioning. Her voting pattern suggests a legislator who carefully evaluates legislation against progressive policy standards, often opposing measures that may represent compromises or approaches she views as insufficient. This is reflected in her position to the left of her party's average on the ideological spectrum.

Key Positions

  • Consistently progressive voting record, more liberal than the Democratic Party average
  • Active engagement on healthcare legislation with selective support based on policy alignment
  • Majority support for budget and agricultural measures
  • Notable support rate for defense-related legislation at 73%
  • Opposition to certain major conference reports and bipartisan compromises

By Policy Area

Healthcare146
47% yea53% nay
Budget & Spending46
59% yea41% nay
Agriculture39
59% yea41% nay
Defense11
73% yea27% nay
Other10
60% yea40% nay
Banking & Finance9
56% yea44% nay

Analysis updated: January 9, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below. Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $19.3M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$325K

79%

PAC / Committees$88K

21%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$248K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$77K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$83K · 26%
$200 – 499
$26K · 8%
$500 – 999
$15K · 4%
$1,000 – 1,999
$44K · 14%
$2,000+
$157K · 48%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (IL)$231K · 93%
Out-of-state$17K · 7%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

IL
$231K
DC
$9K
VA
$5K
MI
$2K
MD
$500
CA
$450
NC
$400
NY
$400

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

RETIRED$58K
SELF-EMPLOYED$39K
NULL$9K
STATE OF ILLINOIS$8K
SELF$7K
STATE OF IL$7K
BGR GROUP$5K
JOHNSON, JONES, SNELLING, GILBERT & DA$4K
SAP$4K
SHARED USE MOBILILTY CENTER$4K
STOWELL & FREIDMAN$4K
HORWITZ HORWITZ AND ASSOCIATES$4K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Administrative
$385K
Other / Uncategorized
$311K
Transfers
$200K
Contributions
$100K
Materials
$5K
Refunds
$5K
Fundraising
$5K
Advertising
$4K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

DCCC

$210K
2.

SHERATON GRAND CHICAGO

$150K
3.

GERSTEN, SARAH

$127K
4.

ADP

$117K
5.

BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF IL

$85K
6.

HEAD, BENJAMIN

$80K
7.

CHASE CARD SERVICES

$36K
8.

TUITE, JACQUE

$23K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$698K

Operating Offsets

$58.01

Net Operating

$698K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$4K

Committee Refunds

$1K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$123K

Opposing

$178K

Total Outside Spending

$301K

Top Outside Spenders

01

AMERICAN OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

+$112K
$112K
02

EMERGENCY COMMITTEE FOR ISRAEL

-$100K
$100K
03

NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

-$76K
$76K
04

DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE

+$8K
$8K
05

REVERE AMERICA

-$2K
$2K
06

ILLINOIS PLANNED PARENTHOOD COUNCIL

+$924-$88
$1K
07

J STREET

+$566.19
$566.19
08

SIERRA CLUB POLITICAL COMMITTEE

+$350
$350

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 6/30/2026FEC: H8IL09067Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Janice D. Schakowsky — U.S. Representative for Illinois 9: Voting Record & Donors | PowerVote