Official portrait of Greg Casar, U.S. Representative for Texas

U.S. Representative

Greg Casar

Texas District 35

DemocratProgressive

Votes on Record

14

across 4 categories

17 analyzed in depth

Contact

202-225-5645Official Website446 Cannon House Office Building Washington DC 20515-4335

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

17 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 healthcare

17

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.42Progressive

Representative Greg Casar positions himself on the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, with a NOMINATE score of -0.424 that places him to the left of the average House Democrat. His voting record reflects consistently liberal positions across most policy areas.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

17

total votes analyzed

Overview

Greg Casar is a first-term Democratic Representative from Texas who entered Congress in 2023. His voting record, while still developing given his relatively short tenure, shows strong alignment with progressive Democratic priorities. On procedural votes, Casar consistently votes with his party, opposing Republican-led rules and resolutions while supporting Democratic motions to recommit. This pattern is typical for members of the minority party seeking to influence legislation or register opposition to majority priorities. His healthcare voting record shows he opposed most measures that came to the floor during this period, voting 'yea' on only 18% of healthcare-related bills. Without more context on the specific legislation, this likely reflects opposition to Republican-sponsored healthcare measures rather than opposition to healthcare policy broadly. Casar has shown willingness to support certain bipartisan measures, as evidenced by his 'yea' votes on motions to suspend the rules, which typically require two-thirds majority and often involve less controversial legislation.

Key Positions

  • Votes consistently with progressive Democratic positions
  • Opposes Republican-led procedural measures and resolutions
  • Supported bipartisan suspension bills in late 2024
  • Generally opposes healthcare legislation brought forward by Republican majority

By Policy Area

Healthcare11
18% yea82% nay

Analysis updated: January 9, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below. Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $4.0M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$889K

78%

PAC / Committees$251K

22%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$622K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$267K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$335K · 37%
$200 – 499
$69K · 8%
$500 – 999
$80K · 9%
$1,000 – 1,999
$128K · 14%
$2,000+
$299K · 33%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (TX)$372K · 58%
Out-of-state$272K · 42%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

TX
$372K
CA
$115K
MA
$39K
DC
$28K
NY
$17K
IL
$16K
CO
$9K
WA
$8K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NOT EMPLOYED$159K
SELF$65K
SELF-EMPLOYED$25K
NULL$16K
NONE$15K
RETIRED$13K
CITY OF AUSTIN$8K
HEISING-SIMONS FOUNDATION$7K
PRESTON-WERNER VENTURES LLC$7K
ADELANTO HEALTHCARE VENTURES LLC$7K
ZYDECO DEVELOPMENT$7K
HILLCO PARTNERS$7K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$858K
Contributions
$23K
Administrative
$20K
Advertising
$16K
Fundraising
$13K
Materials
$13K
Travel
$377.97

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

AMERICAN EXPRESS

$205K
2.

AISLE 518

$176K
3.

HM CONSULTING

$118K
4.

NGP

$51K
5.

LAURA HERNANDEZ CONSULTING, LLC

$38K
6.

PCMS

$37K
7.

GUSTO

$33K
8.

ACTBLUE

$33K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$761K

Operating Offsets

$10K

Net Operating

$751K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$2K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$867K

Opposing

$34K

Total Outside Spending

$901K

Top Outside Spenders

01

WFP NATIONAL PAC

+$545K
$545K
02

JUSTICE DEMOCRATS PAC

+$215K
$215K
03

MIJENTE PAC

+$61K
$61K
04

SAFETX

-$34K
$34K
05

TEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

+$25K
$25K
06

UNITED WE DREAM ACTION

+$11K
$11K
07

INDIVISIBLE ACTION

+$6K
$6K
08

WORKERS DEFENSE ACTION FUND PAC

+$4K
$4K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 6/30/2026FEC: H2TX35144Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Greg Casar — U.S. Representative for Texas 35: Voting Record & Donors | PowerVote