Voting Profile

Legislative Record

182 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 healthcare#2 environment energy#3 other#4 defense#5 social security

182

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

0.48Conservative

Senator Dan Sullivan holds conservative positions, with an ideology score of 0.477 on a scale from -1 (liberal) to +1 (conservative). He is positioned slightly more moderate than the average Republican senator, suggesting occasional deviation from party-line votes on certain issues.

LiberalModerateConservative
Republican avg

Near the average for Republicans (0.52)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

182

total votes analyzed

Overview

Dan Sullivan has represented Alaska in the U.S. Senate since 2015, bringing a conservative perspective to national policy debates while maintaining attention to Alaska-specific concerns. His voting record spans a wide range of policy areas, with particularly active engagement on healthcare and environmental/energy issues. Sullivan's voting patterns show strong support for budget measures and taxation legislation, voting in favor on all recorded votes in these categories. On healthcare, he has voted affirmatively on 57% of measures, suggesting a nuanced approach to health policy that includes both support and opposition to various proposals. His environmental and energy voting record shows a 70% affirmative rate, which may reflect Alaska's unique position as both a major energy-producing state and a state significantly impacted by environmental changes. His defense voting record is relatively balanced, with 52% affirmative votes, consistent with his background as a former Marine Corps officer and past role in the State Department.

Key Positions

  • Supported various healthcare reform efforts with a mixed voting pattern
  • Generally supportive of energy development legislation relevant to Alaska
  • Consistent supporter of budget and taxation measures
  • Active engagement on environmental policy affecting resource-dependent states
  • More skeptical approach to banking and financial regulations with 20% affirmative rate

By Policy Area

Healthcare92
57% yea43% nay
Environment & Energy23
70% yea30% nay
Other22
73% yea27% nay
Defense21
52% yea48% nay
Social Security7
43% yea57% nay
Banking & Finance5
20% yea80% nay

Analysis updated: January 9, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below. Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $30.3M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$5.5M

67%

PAC / Committees$2.6M

32%

Party Committee$62K

1%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$4.8M

Small Dollar (<$200)

$698K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$677K · 10%
$200 – 499
$152K · 2%
$500 – 999
$389K · 6%
$1,000 – 1,999
$1.2M · 18%
$2,000+
$4.2M · 64%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (AK)$853K · 14%
Out-of-state$5.2M · 86%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

AK
$853K
FL
$720K
TX
$659K
CA
$578K
NY
$578K
IL
$321K
VA
$314K
OH
$274K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

RETIRED$1.3M
SELF EMPLOYED$234K
HOMEMAKER$196K
SELF$150K
NULL$76K
UNEMPLOYED$54K
KKR$50K
BLACKSTONE$39K
NOT EMPLOYED$35K
INFORMATION REQUESTED$29K
RDV CORPORATION$21K
GCI LIBERTY$20K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$1.8M
Fundraising
$173K
Advertising
$127K
Administrative
$94K
Materials
$43K
Refunds
$13K
Travel
$205

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

MAYBELL GROUP, LLC

$310K
2.

NORTHRIM CARDMEMBER SERVICES

$242K
3.

PEAK INSIGHTS

$201K
4.

RIZZO DUKES GROUP LLC

$199K
5.

BLACK ROCK GROUP LLC

$182K
6.

UNISOURCE DIRECT, LLC

$154K
7.

ARENA ONLINE

$98K
8.

PRAGMATIC DATA SOLUTIONS

$84K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$5.1M

Operating Offsets

$9K

Net Operating

$5.1M

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$14K

Committee Refunds

$11K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$3.1M

Opposing

$44.4M

Total Outside Spending

$47.5M

Top Outside Spenders

01

PUT ALASKA FIRST

-$13.2M
$13.2M
02

NORTH STAR

-$12.6M
$12.6M
03

DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE

-$7.1M
$7.1M
04

314 ACTION FUND

-$3.2M
$3.2M
05

THE LINCOLN PROJECT

-$2.5M
$2.5M
06

VOTEVETS

-$1.6M
$1.6M
07

LCV VICTORY FUND

-$1.6M
$1.6M
08

NEA ADVOCACY FUND

+$728K-$728K
$1.5M

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2021 7/29/2026FEC: S4AK00214Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Dan Sullivan — U.S. Senator for Alaska: Voting Record & Donors | PowerVote